Anthropic

Tier B · Specialist or second-choice models.

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic's previous flagship, now superseded by Fable 5.1. Kept in the editorial roster for inspection of its 16 published visual benchmark runs.

Verified model facts

Identity, limits, and pricing

Provider source · checked 2026-09-02 ↗
Status
Current
API model ID
claude-fable-5
Context
1M
Max output
128K
License
Not publicly verified
Access route
Not publicly verified
Modalities
Not publicly verified
Hardware
Not publicly verified
API price / 1M tokens
$10 input · $— cached input · $50 output

Same-prompt visual tests

Inspect the actual runs

Open the generated scene to test it, or compare that prompt with another model.

16 runs

City Scroll Journey

Cinematic scroll journey testing AI-generated scene continuity, scroll-scrubbed camera motion, and art-directed landing craft.

Mechanical Watch Simulator

Interactive watch movement testing mechanical legibility, accurate relative motion, and real-time 3D controls.

Stormwind Trebuchet Simulator

Counterweight siege simulation testing coupled mechanics, trajectory prediction, projectile cameras, and interactive tuning.

Editorial verdict

Where this model fits

Back to all benchmarks →

Fable 5 led the S tier as the previous Anthropic flagship before Fable 5.1 replaced it. Its 16 published Superbash visual benchmark runs are preserved for inspection. The editorial placement is B because Fable 5.1 is now the recommended Anthropic flagship.

Best for

  • Inspecting published benchmark runs
  • Comparisons against the full Fable 5 visual set
  • Historical editorial record

Watch out

  • Fable 5.1 is the current Anthropic flagship
  • Premium API pricing
  • Benchmarks are preserved for reference, not as a current recommendation

Why it is ranked here

  1. Fable 5.1 launched on September 1, 2026 as the direct successor at the same price point.
  2. The full 16-run Superbash visual set was completed with Fable 5 and is preserved for inspection.
  3. B tier reflects that Fable 5.1 is the recommended Anthropic flagship, not a capability judgment.

Evidence

2026-08-27

Superbash editorial model ranking

Takeaway: Claude Fable 5 is currently placed in Tier B.

The August 2026 editorial roster places Claude Fable 5 at rank 11.

Open source →

Official benchmark profile

Published scores outside our visual tests

Comparable numeric rows from the Anthropic system card and the shared GPT-5.6 comparison table. Marketing-only claims such as ViBench and spreadsheet speedups are excluded unless a score is published.

Anthropic sourceJune 2026Source report →
Coding

SWE-bench Pro

80.0%
Coding

SWE-bench Verified

95.0%
Agentic coding

Terminal-Bench 2.1

84.3%
Full official benchmark table14 rows with source settings and peer charts
BenchmarkAreaScoreSetting / comparison
SWE-bench ProCoding80.0%Average over 5 trials; standard configuration with thinking blocks included.
Claude Fable 580.0%
Claude Opus 4.869.2%
GPT-5.6 Sol64.6%
GPT-5.6 Terra63.4%
GPT-5.6 Luna62.7%
GPT-5.559.4%
Gemini 3.1 Pro54.2%
SWE-bench VerifiedCoding95.0%Average over 5 trials on the 500-problem verified subset.
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic coding84.3%Anthropic mini-SWE-agent harness at high effort; OpenAI’s shared table reports Fable at 83.1%.
GPT-5.6 Sol88.8%
GPT-5.6 Terra87.4%
GPT-5.585.6%
GPT-5.6 Luna84.7%
Claude Fable 584.3%
Claude Opus 4.878.9%
Gemini 3.1 Pro70.7%
FrontierCode DiamondAgentic coding29.3% score / 30.2% passMean@5 at xhigh reasoning effort on Cognition’s Diamond subset.
Claude Fable 529.3% score / 30.2% pass
Claude Opus 4.813.4% score / 14.5% pass
GPT-5.55.7% score / 6.4% pass
FrontierCode MainAgentic coding46.3% score / 48.8% passMean@5 at xhigh reasoning effort on Cognition’s Main subset.
Claude Fable 546.3% score / 48.8% pass
Claude Opus 4.834.3% score / 37.3% pass
GPT-5.525.5% score / 28.2% pass
CursorBenchAgentic coding72.9%Cursor production agent harness at maximum effort.
Claude Fable 572.9%
GPT-5.564.3%
GPQA DiamondAcademic reasoning92.6%Shared GPT-5.6 comparison table.
GPT-5.6 Sol94.6%
Gemini 3.1 Pro94.3%
Claude Mythos 594.1%
GPT-5.593.6%
GPT-5.6 Terra92.9%
Claude Fable 592.6%
GPT-5.6 Luna92.3%
Claude Opus 4.892.0%
FrontierMath Tier 1-3 v2Math87.0%Shared GPT-5.6 comparison table.
GPT-5.6 Sol89.0%
Claude Fable 587.0%
GPT-5.585.3%
GPT-5.6 Terra84.9%
Claude Opus 4.880.0%
GPT-5.6 Luna78.6%
Gemini 3.1 Pro59.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2Math87.8%Shared GPT-5.6 comparison table.
Claude Fable 587.8%
GPT-5.6 Sol83.0%
GPT-5.572.5%
GPT-5.6 Terra68.3%
GPT-5.6 Luna58.5%
Claude Opus 4.856.1%
OSWorld-VerifiedComputer use85.0%Pass@1 averaged over 5 runs on 361 tasks with 100 action steps.
Claude Fable 585.0%
Claude Opus 4.883.4%
GPT-5.578.7%
Gemini 3.5 Flash78.4%
Blueprint-Bench 2Spatial reasoning38.6%Andon Labs standard harness; normalized composite floor-plan score.
Claude Fable 538.6%
GPT-5.536.2%
Gemini 3.5 Flash33.6%
OfficeQA ProDocument reasoning57.9%Databricks image-based OfficeQA Pro evaluation.
Claude Fable 557.9%
GPT-5.552.6%
Claude Opus 4.848.1%
Finance Agent Benchmark v2Finance56.31%Vals AI evaluation with adaptive thinking and max effort.
Claude Fable 556.31%
Claude Opus 4.853.92%
GPT-5.551.76%
MCP AtlasOffice work83.3%Pass rate on real-world MCP tool-use workflows.
Claude Fable 583.3%
Claude Opus 4.882.2%